Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAS14

(15,472 posts)
Fri Jan 30, 2026, 04:06 PM 2 hrs ago

Something I've never understood about the Epstein thing.

Today a talking head said words to this effect... "We want the names of the men released and the internal memos released so the American people can determine their guilt." I'm pretty sure about the words "so the American people can determine their guilt." What happened to innocent until proven guilty? What happened to trials by jury? Just asking.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Something I've never understood about the Epstein thing. (Original Post) LAS14 2 hrs ago OP
A jury is an agent of the American people. Ocelot II 2 hrs ago #1
IANAL, but usonian 2 hrs ago #2
Doesn't apply to the general public dpibel 1 hr ago #3
Innocent until proven guilty Progressive dog 1 hr ago #4

usonian

(23,967 posts)
2. IANAL, but
Fri Jan 30, 2026, 04:15 PM
2 hrs ago

Determination

The final resolution or conclusion of a controversy.

In legal use, determination usually implies the conclusion of a dispute or lawsuit by the rendering of a final decision.

After consideration of the facts, a determination is generally set forth by a court of justice or other type of formal decision maker, such as the head of an Administrative Agency.

Determination has been used synonymously with adjudication, award, decree, and judgment. A ruling is a judicial determination concerning matters, such as the admissibility of evidence or a judicial or an administrative interpretation of a statute or regulation.

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/determine

dpibel

(3,817 posts)
3. Doesn't apply to the general public
Fri Jan 30, 2026, 04:19 PM
1 hr ago

I have no obligation to presume anyone innocent.

Because I have no say in their punishment or lack thereof.

The presumption of innocence is binding on those who mete out punishment, including government officials who have direct or indirect effects on prosecution. It's also binding on the members of a jury.

But think about it: OJ Simpson was not proven guilty. In fact, he was acquitted by a jury. Does that stop a great many people from knowing that he was guilty, guilty, guilty?

Progressive dog

(7,580 posts)
4. Innocent until proven guilty
Fri Jan 30, 2026, 05:09 PM
1 hr ago

only applies to jurors.
If I watch several videos showing ICE shooting people without cause, I'm allowed to believe they are murderers. I can't punish them, but I don't have to pretend they didn't do it. Ive already determined their guilt in my mind.
As to Epstein, there were lots of victims but almost no justice. Only Ghislaine is in jail and probably not for long. The most notorious person in the Epstein files will probably pardon her so that she keeps her mouth shut.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something I've never unde...