Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCalifornia landowners who cut 38 trees in Oakland hills hit with $915,000 fine
https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/california-landowners-who-cut-38-trees-in-oakland-22245228.phpThe fine is perhaps the largest ever in Oakland for destroying trees.
Councilmembers Janani Ramachandran, Noel Gallo, Kevin Jenkins, Zac Unger and Charlene Wang voted for the fine. Rowena Brown, Carroll Fife and Ken Houston voted no.
Emeryville residents Matthew Bernard and Lynn Warner purchased the hillside lot behind the Claremont Hotel and Club in 2019. Two years later, city staff said the couple started felling trees without permits. The trees included native live oaks, broad-leaf maples, buckeyes and other species.
Bernard repeatedly ignored warnings that he needed permits to cut down the trees, city staff said. Some of the trees were on neighboring properties.
The couple applied for building permits to construct a single-family residence, but Oakland issued them a notice of violation of the citys protected tree ordinance last year. When staff calculated the value of each tree from a small plum worth $750 to a mature coast live oak valued at $95,000 the total was nearly $1 million.
City staff say trees provide valuable ecosystem services like preventing fires, holding hillside together against erosion and debris flows, supporting biodiversity, cleaning the air and improving peoples mental health.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California landowners who cut 38 trees in Oakland hills hit with $915,000 fine (Original Post)
BlueWaveNeverEnd
1 hr ago
OP
sakabatou
(46,271 posts)1. Welcome to r/treelaw!
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(14,833 posts)2. More: Fife railed against what she said were racially inequitable policies, making comparisons with the drug war, mass i
https://oaklandside.org/2026/05/05/trees-illegally-cut-fine-oakland/
Bernard asked the council to resolve the matter by waiving the fine and allowing him and Warner to replant new trees after they built their home.
Councilmembers Brown and Fife wanted to find a solution more favorable to Bernard. Brown called Oaklands protected tree ordinance outdated and said it felt unfair to impose such a large fine on the property owners for chopping down trees the city would likely have permitted removal of anyway.
I believe a truly equitable approach requires us to distinguish between preventable loss and inevitable removal, she said. She tried to get her colleagues to vote for a roughly $300,000 reduction in the fine.
Fife railed against what she said were racially inequitable policies, making comparisons with the drug war, mass incarceration and colonization, while noting that Bernard is Black and his property is located in an area where people of color were prohibited from living in the early 20th century. She supported Browns proposal.
Bernard asked the council to resolve the matter by waiving the fine and allowing him and Warner to replant new trees after they built their home.
Councilmembers Brown and Fife wanted to find a solution more favorable to Bernard. Brown called Oaklands protected tree ordinance outdated and said it felt unfair to impose such a large fine on the property owners for chopping down trees the city would likely have permitted removal of anyway.
I believe a truly equitable approach requires us to distinguish between preventable loss and inevitable removal, she said. She tried to get her colleagues to vote for a roughly $300,000 reduction in the fine.
Fife railed against what she said were racially inequitable policies, making comparisons with the drug war, mass incarceration and colonization, while noting that Bernard is Black and his property is located in an area where people of color were prohibited from living in the early 20th century. She supported Browns proposal.
twodogsbarking
(19,216 posts)3. Money brings out the best in people.
erronis
(24,383 posts)4. It would be a fun experiment to see how these people live with no money.
No gifts, no secret funds, just NO MONEY.
How many hours on the street hustling for grub would it take for them to change character? If ever?
chouchou
(3,262 posts)5. I'd be the Wicked-Witch-of-the-West.
We have scum here in Florida that think trees are an "Annoyance"
Usually from hell...
irisblue
(37,750 posts)6. Matthew Bernard and Lynn Warner are assholes