Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,653 posts)
Sun May 10, 2026, 06:05 PM 7 hrs ago

Dems eye 'audacious' secret plan to oust entire blue state Supreme Court: report

Given the outrageous ruling by SCOTUS, the GO P actions taken in Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi and Alabama, these steps are appropriate. The GOP cannot claim clean hands given the steps taken by SCOTUS and these states.

Dems eye 'audacious' secret plan to oust entire blue state Supreme Court: report

DO IT! Get creatove Dems. No shame. No "but my precious decorum". Fight. The. Fascists. #Virginia

www.rawstory.com/virginia-red...

br00t4c (@br00t4c.bsky.social) 2026-05-10T19:51:47.254Z

https://www.rawstory.com/virginia-redistricting-2676875271/

Congressional Democrats are quietly kicking around a long-shot scheme to clear out Virginia's entire Supreme Court, which just torched their gerrymandered congressional map.

During a private Saturday call that included Virginia's Democratic House delegation and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), lawmakers vented over Friday's ruling and floated what The New York Times described as "an audacious and possibly far-fetched idea" to replace every sitting justice and reinstate their map, according to a Sunday report.

The scheme includes lowering the mandatory judicial retirement age from 75 to 54 — the age of the youngest current justice — forcing all seven off the bench. Virginia judges are appointed by the Democratic-controlled General Assembly, which could then stack the court with friendly replacements.

"The conversation reflected the desperation and fury that have gripped the party after the state Supreme Court struck down a favorable map that had been ratified by voters," the Times wrote, calling the mass ouster the "most dramatic idea they discussed."

The idea reportedly drew "mixed reactions" on the call, and Democrats did not land on a path forward. Gov. Abigail Spanberger has not been briefed, her spokeswoman told the Times. Former Rep. James Moran (D-VA) warned the gambit would be "just a bridge too far" and could backfire.

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA), who was on the call, told the Times he supports doing whatever is necessary, adding: "Everyone has got to have a strong stomach right now; this is a complete disaster waiting to happen if people are timid."

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dems eye 'audacious' secret plan to oust entire blue state Supreme Court: report (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 7 hrs ago OP
This will be great if they follow through. Scrivener7 7 hrs ago #1
Yes! Please!!! bamagal62 7 hrs ago #2
I believe such discussions should remain private Raven123 7 hrs ago #3
Bring the "Chicago Way" to Virginia Politics JohnQFunk 7 hrs ago #4
What do you mean when you say nuke them? MichMan 2 hrs ago #9
Thank you Vir. reps who have a strong stomach. Baitball Blogger 6 hrs ago #5
Just do it. dalton99a 6 hrs ago #6
Not going to happen FBaggins 2 hrs ago #7
it's clear they have the power. scipan 2 hrs ago #10
Enough is enough! Fire all the Murdoch stooges and Trump ass kissers NOW! Initech 2 hrs ago #8
Is that something that can just be done legislatively or would it require a constitutional amendment? MichMan 2 hrs ago #11
Planning to save the rule of law by tossing out judges for disagreeing with us EdmondDantes_ 2 hrs ago #12

Raven123

(7,877 posts)
3. I believe such discussions should remain private
Sun May 10, 2026, 06:33 PM
7 hrs ago

This is serious stuff with significant ramifications. The reason for making public such discussions at this point escapes me.

JohnQFunk

(497 posts)
4. Bring the "Chicago Way" to Virginia Politics
Sun May 10, 2026, 06:37 PM
7 hrs ago

It's time for gloves-off, ruthless escalation.
In the words of advice from Jim Malone, the beat cop in Brian de Palma's 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙐𝙣𝙩𝙤𝙪𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚𝙨, to Eliot Ness, "He pulls a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue."
They stack the House delegation, we nuke the State 'Supremo Crime Family'.
And - oh yes - that's what we call the ousted judges. Along with the six fascists on the US Supreme Court.

FBaggins

(28,734 posts)
7. Not going to happen
Sun May 10, 2026, 10:43 PM
2 hrs ago

The state supreme court would (likely unanimously) block such a move... and there's a nonzero chance that SCOTUS would take a shot at it too.

It's just a trial balloon to show the base "we're fighting this with every tool at our disposal!"

MichMan

(17,353 posts)
11. Is that something that can just be done legislatively or would it require a constitutional amendment?
Sun May 10, 2026, 11:22 PM
2 hrs ago

Would it violate any state or federal laws on age discrimination?

EdmondDantes_

(2,025 posts)
12. Planning to save the rule of law by tossing out judges for disagreeing with us
Sun May 10, 2026, 11:34 PM
2 hrs ago

That's at best a bad plan. And that's before accounting for it's not actually "necessary" to get a majority in the House. And doesn't make us look like we're not just as petty and partisan above country as Republicans.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dems eye 'audacious' secr...