Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ultralite001

(2,822 posts)
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 11:18 PM 5 hrs ago

DOJ's response to Katie Phang...

Justice Department officials in a new court filing released July 2, 2026 defended their limited release
of investigative materials tied to the case of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

PHANG v. BLANCHE
Response to Order to Show Cause — Document #19
District Court, District of Columbia
Docket Number: 1:26-cv-01417

Citation: PHANG v. BLANCHE, 1:26-cv-01417, (D.D.C. Jul 02, 2026) ECF No. 19

Date Filed: July 2nd, 2026, 7:11 p.m. EDT

Uploaded: July 2nd, 2026, 8:09 p.m. EDT

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73246595/19/phang-v-blanche/


There is no justice from Justice... The cover-up continues...

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ's response to Katie Phang... (Original Post) ultralite001 5 hrs ago OP
They're not going to get away with it. Wiz Imp 5 hrs ago #1
i just looked it over and i think Judge Sullivan is gonna read this lawyer a fucking riot act in the morning. Volaris 2 hrs ago #7
Well said... ultralite001 2 hrs ago #8
I love fireworks... ultralite001 4 hrs ago #2
If our military abides... purr-rat beauty 4 hrs ago #3
DOJ clearly being cornered and on the defensive. vapor2 4 hrs ago #4
I. Am. Katie. Phang .MOFOS! czarjak 2 hrs ago #5
The dance continues..... BeneteauBum 2 hrs ago #6

Wiz Imp

(10,904 posts)
1. They're not going to get away with it.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 11:30 PM
5 hrs ago

They clearly and blatantly broke the law. I don't know what will happen next, but you can take it to the bank that this judge will be hopping mad at the DOJ.

Volaris

(11,870 posts)
7. i just looked it over and i think Judge Sullivan is gonna read this lawyer a fucking riot act in the morning.
Fri Jul 3, 2026, 02:07 AM
2 hrs ago

DOJ arguments are, effectively,

It's all victims names and stuff, so we can't release it..just trust us

We gave it to congress already

Congress can go look at what we haven't

The redacted copy we have in the office, is the only copy we can find, and we've no idea where the original is.

L O L

(Oh and we still want another 60 days in case Judge Sullivan reads us the riot act for not complying SO WE CAN APPEAL).

This is the DOJ telling the court that only CONGRESS can tell us what to do with this stuff and how to do it; who the fuck is either the court OR katie to say different.

purr-rat beauty

(1,694 posts)
3. If our military abides...
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 11:53 PM
4 hrs ago

...to a wishful onslaught

That would be game over.

The Pentagon better wake up.
Please

vapor2

(5,171 posts)
4. DOJ clearly being cornered and on the defensive.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 11:57 PM
4 hrs ago

Not sure what but something has to give soon. We can no longer be held hostage by these criminals

BeneteauBum

(993 posts)
6. The dance continues.....
Fri Jul 3, 2026, 02:02 AM
2 hrs ago

The whole republican platform is deflection and obfuscation. Katie will keep at it and the truth will come out.

Peace ☮️

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DOJ's response to Katie P...