General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI find Platner's suggestion that the accusations are politically motivated disgusting and disqualifying
My part of the story was just a read-over, Racicot said in an interview. And the story was Lyndsey, and the accusations of her being politically motivated.
Racicot said she was torn over coming forward in part because she agrees with Platner politically.
One of the reasons I didnt come forward sooner was, the huge moral conflict that I had between supporting his politics, but not supporting him as a person, she said. I just want the truth out there. I just want people to have a whole scope of who he is as a person.
...Racicot also shared details about the alleged assault to the man she dated after Platner, who she began dating in 2022. The man, who was granted anonymity out of concern for his personal privacy, told POLITICO that Racicot had told him in bits and pieces about a bad experience with Platner before confiding the full details of what had happened in 2023. His account of what Racicot told him about the incident matched what Racicot told POLITICO.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/06/graham-platner-sexual-assault-allegation-00987737
In a statement, the Platner campaign reiterated his denial and accused critics of trying to drive him out of the race.
...Platner's response lumps this latest accusation with others, which he's also failed to directly address, and does little here except denigrate his accuser, who, it appears, never called him a "Nazi, a war criminal, or a communist," and has expressed support for his politics.
This is a reprehensible response, and his accusatory defenses are not any responsible or reasonable measure of accountability to these claims.
I have no vote in his state, and I realize that the political effect of posting this on social media response amounts to little except trolling him. But his accusers deserve better than these hurtful deflections which I personally find unfitting for someone who would be contributing to making our nation's laws in the U.S. Senate.
RandySF
(88,339 posts)Lancero
(3,286 posts)niyad
(135,706 posts)been enough..
Keepthesoulalive
(2,489 posts)This man is not it. Being a senator comes with cash perks and power. Why would we give that to an unproven and deeply flawed individual?
Sparkly
(24,974 posts)Well, because flawed individual Susan Collins rubber stamped flawed Drumpf's Supreme Court nominations - Gorsuch, Barrett, and most famously, Kavanaugh - thus overturning Roe v. Wade. Anyone with a chance to beat her was worth supporting. But it looks like Democrats got tanked.
Keepthesoulalive
(2,489 posts)There is only hard work and a clear head, this man is 40 car pileup and he has no clue what it takes to be a senator. We have a bullshitter in the highest office in the land a man with no experience but he talked a good talk. Lets not do that to ourselves again , we need competent leaders not neophytes.
SSJVegeta
(3,522 posts)But they exist as the many. Not the one.
Keepthesoulalive
(2,489 posts)People treat certain politicians as heroes most of them are not. Im asking people to stop worshipping names such as maga or progressive and give clear thought to who you support. We can get into the weeds with word games but the candidate from Maine is no progressive hero, he will not lead us to the promised land of good governance.
yardwork
(70,162 posts)betsuni
(29,510 posts)#1. Pessimism: The system is broken and everyone's corrupt, the establishment is corrupted by money, everything's terrible and getting worse. "This country is facing more serious problems today than at any other time since the Great Depression" said a savior in 2015 (the one who tried to primary Obama in 2012).
#2. The only reason our Will of the People movement doesn't happen is because the establishment is stopping us.They despise us! Everybody knows we are right and the only possible reason to not agree is because you're corrupt.
#3. Optimism: But at last we have found the savior who'll destroy the establishment and fix everything. We'll take over the party and transform it There are simple solutions for all problems but the establishment won't do it because they're ... everybody say it together: corrupt.
Keepthesoulalive
(2,489 posts)The bros are having a fit. The dems are trying to destroy him, hes the only one who is progressive and the woman is lying. We have a bunch of young men who are lost and looking for a leader preferably male, they have no core values otherwise when Bernie lost they would not have voted for trump. I am worried about our country when young men can be herded by influencers.
betsuni
(29,510 posts)The response sounds just like typical Justice Democrats PAC stylings: The establishment throws the kitchen sink at us, conspiring to stop at nothing to defeat us because our movement terrifies them blah blah blah... Too bad they didn't include the part about the smokey backroom where Democratic establishment corruption monsters enjoy canapés and pink champagne cocktails with the donor class oligarch billionaires, chuckling about ignoring working families.
mopinko
(74,294 posts)AIPAC, AIPAC, AIPAC.
(yes, it is possible to criticize israel and not b antisemitic. but the current fever about aipac is not that.)
mcar
(46,705 posts)Me, I think all PACs are bad for our system. But somehow, this is the only one that is held to a higher? standard.
mopinko
(74,294 posts)but somehow gets all the attention.
like israel. no comment on the other unquestionable genocides going on in the world, but gaza is the center of the spotlight. and no smoke for hamas.
antisemitism is defensible again.
mcar
(46,705 posts)mopinko
(74,294 posts)try getting elected as a dem w/o refusing their money AND speaking out against it.
mopinko
(74,294 posts)ppl dog whistling away, thinking theyre being clever.
mcar
(46,705 posts)mcar
(46,705 posts)Pretty much every Democrat in congress is for expanding healthcare access - and for all the other positions progressives espouse. But somehow they are corporatist centrists who (gasp) take campaign $$ from PACs.
yardwork
(70,162 posts)I agree with everything you posted above, except that it's not trolling to talk about this.
The country is hanging by a thread. We have two more years of Trump and Vance. We must win back Congress to stop the loss of democracy. It's not an exaggeration.
Winning the Senate back is essential. We need to take back control of committees, be able to launch investigations into Trump and his cronies, put forward legislation to help the millions of Americans who are suffering, and prevent more Trump appointments to the Supreme Court.
In order to win back the Senate we need to flip Maine. Collins is vulnerable. We can and must win that Senate seat.
Imo the Democratic Party leaders need to get a LOT better at vetting candidates in advance.
And that's why it's important to talk about this.
mcar
(46,705 posts)Liberal activists who were behind Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner's campaign admitted that their vetting process did not pick up certain issues such as his controversial Nazi-linked tattoo.
Wall Street Journal reporter Aaron Zitner spoke to Daniel Moraff, Leanne Fan and Morris Katz, three activists who "handpicked" Platner to challenge Maine Sen. Susan Collins for her Senate seat ahead of the 2026 midterms. During the interview, which premiered on Sunday, Zitner asked about the vetting process after choosing to run with Platner.
"We paid a nice firm a whole chunk of money and got some stuff back," Moraff said. "Some of what you've seen on the news we got back, other stuff we didn't."
yardwork
(70,162 posts)Who are these people? Who funded Platner's early campaign? What oppo firm did they hire? What kind of experience did the firm have with national political campaigns?
Why did three activists "handpick" a candidate who had never run for any office before to run for the Senate?
And, what attributes did Platner have that nobody else had?
Because it's not that hard to find people willing to run for office who will campaign on anti-Trump, pro-healthcare for all platforms.
mcar
(46,705 posts)Vinca
(54,625 posts)WinningAgain
(52 posts)We blew it by running a VERY flawed candidate.
mcar
(46,705 posts)He needs to step down today.
BannonsLiver
(21,135 posts)Im far less concerned about his words at this point. Horse before the cart, etc.
Emile
(44,284 posts)EdmondDantes_
(2,338 posts)Just like you shouldn't have tried to dismiss the previous allegations to being from a Republican. It doesn't matter if Collins is concerned. Being against rape shouldn't come down to political party. That it does for Republicans is an embarrassment to them.
Cha
(321,718 posts)Mayor Mamdani and all the other leaders who retracted endorsements don't believe Planter's "denials".