Bakery in New Hampshire wins in free speech case over a pastry shop painting
Source: AP
By KATHY McCORMACK and LEAH WILLINGHAM
Updated 2:18 PM CDT, May 20, 2025
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) A New Hampshire towns attempt to force a bakery to remove or alter its painting that shows sunbeams shining down on a mountain range of doughnuts, a muffin, a cinnamon roll and other pastries is unconstitutional, a judge ruled in a First Amendment dispute.
The town of Conway infringed on the free speech rights of bakery owner Sean Young, U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante ruled Monday, following a one-day trial in February.
He ordered the town to stop any efforts at enforcing its sign code regarding the mural painted by high school students atop Leavitts Country Bakery, mentioning a complete disconnect between what the ordinance purports to regulate and the towns enforcement, as well as the illogical way it applied and explained that enforcement to Leavitts.
Im thrilled that the students artwork can remain up, Im thrilled that my First Amendment rights have been vindicated, and Im thrilled that the community can continue to enjoy the beautiful piece of art, Young said in a statement. I think our mural is a wonderful depiction of everything that makes the Mount Washington Valley such a great place to live.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/bakery-doughnuts-painting-free-speech-new-hampshire-c5f8e93abbb13ddc73445bbfa20dbe6f

hlthe2b
(110,010 posts)sigh
cyclonefence
(5,066 posts)No wonder the courts have no time for immigrants to appeal Could there be anything stupider to get your drawers in a twist over? It's not even a proper rainbow!
malthaussen
(18,104 posts)cyclonefence
(5,066 posts)just a guess. I looked and looked and couldn't find anything else they might object to. I mean, it's amateurish but then high school kids painted it, and somehow I don't think these folks would sue over aesthetic choices.
sl8
(16,585 posts)The owner claimed that it was art, not a sign
If the painting didnt show whats sold inside baked goods it wouldnt be considered a sign and could stay, board members said.
cyclonefence
(5,066 posts)I am humbled.
fujiyamasan
(235 posts)Like the size of a sign and not because it was showing a rainbow. One indicates a town with dumb red tape laws. The other shows something far more hateful.
swong19104
(429 posts)all those baked goods? Imagine the triglycerides and raised levels of blood sugar levels upon chowing down on them! Such a shop ought to be nuked from space. With lasers, just as the mural depicts.
cyclonefence
(5,066 posts)I never heard such blaspheming and downright obscenity suggested on this machine--quick, the needle!
Mother, forgive them for they know not what they say.
Maraya1969
(23,280 posts)sl8
(16,585 posts)The town said it was too big for a sign. The owner said it wasn't a sign, it was art. The judge agreed with the owner.
onenote
(45,284 posts)It's a somewhat weird and confusing opinion. For example, at the outset, the judge states: "The court here does not rule that the sign code is unlawful or unconstitutional as written. Neither does it rule that Conway could not lawfully regulate the Leavitts display, or that the display does not violate the sign code as written. Nor does the court rule that the Leavitts display is not commercial speech (as it certainly appears to be), that municipalities may not regulate commercial signage like the display at issue here,4 or that the sign code necessarily implicates any particular level or tier of First Amendment scrutiny. The court rules only that Conways application of its sign code, and specifically its enforcement of the sign code to the Leavitts sign in the particular manner it employed in this case, does not withstand any level of constitutional scrutiny." The decision also refers to that, "the plaintiffs dubious testimony, that the display is a mural (not a sign) solely intended as an artistic expression, and thus not commercial speech.... Of course, it is a sign under the language of the sign code and under the towns interpretation of its code, and it quite clearly proposes a commercial transaction (the sale of baked goods) at and inside the structure on which it is erected."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nhd.60707/gov.uscourts.nhd.60707.60.0.pdf
sl8
(16,585 posts)Last edited Wed May 21, 2025, 04:14 PM - Edit history (1)
Thanks for the explanation and for finding the decision. I looked for it last night, to no avail.
DoBW
(2,527 posts)
boonecreek
(999 posts)markodochartaigh
(2,980 posts)"Berliner".
Igel
(36,787 posts)AllaN01Bear
(25,439 posts)

BidenRocks
(1,556 posts)Nothing else going on in town to bitch about?
Okay, I looked. An auto accident and an obit.
They really have nothing else to do except fucking with a bakery.
Is it too "gay"! I bet the kids love it!
Let me take a wild guess and say that you support chump!
Yep. They lean Red.
sl8
(16,585 posts)And what makes you think that it was "too 'gay'"?
BidenRocks
(1,556 posts)Was it too big or was that just an excuse to downsize or remove the artwork. It matches the roof width.
I am cynical of late when it comes to any size government fucking with citizens.
Small town HOA government. We say what goes, or else.
Too much color bothers them.
orleans
(36,070 posts)kellytore
(230 posts)honoring quarterback Justin Fields on the brick wall of the restaurant. Fields went to Kennesaw Mountain High School two miles away, and had just been signed by the Chicago Bears. The city council was not happy with the mural and ordered them to take it down. There was a huge backlash from the people living here so they finally backtracked and allowed the mural to remain. The store owner had to pay a fine for not getting a permit but the mural several years later is still there. Sometimes there is no common sense with these city leaders.
Vinca
(52,144 posts)to hormone treatments to sanctuary cities, etc., etc., etc. They've always been fools, but now they're fools on steroids.
onenote
(45,284 posts)The court cites examples of the town seeking to enforce its sign code dating back to 2006.
Vinca
(52,144 posts)other ways by making the prices of permits and licenses higher than other states.
Igel
(36,787 posts)"Live freer ... die."
CTyankee
(66,302 posts)It seems that since I've been living in New England I have heard about New Hampshire being more conservative than any other NE state and I could never figure it out. I live in New Haven and I love it and I have grandkids in MA who I visit often.
I'm not a native New Englander; I'm a 3rd generation Texan who left Texas vowing never to return and I love New England and esp. my home town of New Haven. Is there something in New Hampshire's history that made it less liberal than other NE states?
Bluestocking
(115 posts)Conway attracts vacationers all year long. Skiing in the winter, great mountains rivers and lakes in the summer and fall foliage in the fall. It is not a small town. The traffic is awful in July and August. I have not been there in the fall or winter. It sounds like the town has rules and felt the business violated them. This one is not red vs blue.
SheltieLover
(69,111 posts)
