Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(153,696 posts)
Thu May 29, 2025, 01:24 PM Thursday

Second court blocks Trump tariffs as 'unlawful'

Source: ABC News

May 29, 2025, 1:00 PM


The Trump administration is urging the New York-based Court of International Trade to delay its order blocking President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, warning that enforcement of the ruling will cause a “foreign policy disaster scenario.” In an opinion on Wednesday, the three-judge panel struck down Trump's global tariffs as "contrary to law."

The judges found that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act -- which Trump used to enact his tariffs -- does not give him the "unlimited" power to levy tariffs like the president has in recent months. "The President's assertion of tariff-making authority in the instant case, unbounded as it is by any limitation in duration or scope, exceeds any tariff authority delegated to the President under IEEPA. The Worldwide and Retaliatory tariffs are thus ultra vires and contrary to law," the judges wrote.

According to the judges, Congress, not the president, has the authority to impose tariffs under most circumstances, and Trump's tariffs do not meet the limited condition of an "unusual and extraordinary threat" that would allow him to act alone.

On Thursday, a second federal court determined that Trump’s global (sic) were “unlawful.” U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras said in an order the International Economic Emergency Economic Powers Act does not give the president the power to impose most of his recent tariffs. Notably, the decision from Contreras – an Obama appointee – only restricts the Trump administration's ability to collect tariffs from the two companies that filed the lawsuit, Learning Resources, Inc., and hand2mind, Inc.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/federal-court-trump-power-impose-tariffs-unilaterally/story?id=122290881



NOTE (from excerpt) - this is a 2nd court that limits the ruling to 2 companies -

On Thursday, a second federal court determined that Trump’s global (sic) were “unlawful.”

(snip)

only restricts the Trump administration's ability to collect tariffs from the two companies that filed the lawsuit, Learning Resources, Inc., and hand2mind, Inc.


REFERENCE - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143446849
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Second court blocks Trump tariffs as 'unlawful' (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Thursday OP
BREAKING: In a second ruling in under 18 hours Judge has just struck down Trump's tariffs, ruling them unlawful LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #1
Thank you for a copy of the order! BumRushDaShow Thursday #2
I have not finished reading the International Trade Court opinion LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #3
TACO for the Reversal! Captain Zero Thursday #4
Also from the article chowder66 Thursday #5
so what moonshinegnomie Thursday #6
I guess the courts will save Democracy pfitz59 Thursday #7
In order to get a stay of the ruling on tariffs, trump's attorneys had to promise to refund all tariffs LetMyPeopleVote Friday #8
I don't know if the stay applied to this case BumRushDaShow Friday #9
Both cases are currently before the DC Circuit LetMyPeopleVote Friday #10
Here is the order BumRushDaShow Friday #11

LetMyPeopleVote

(164,108 posts)
1. BREAKING: In a second ruling in under 18 hours Judge has just struck down Trump's tariffs, ruling them unlawful
Thu May 29, 2025, 01:53 PM
Thursday

This is not surprising given the fact that these tariffs were clearly not authorized. There will be more rulings on these tariffs that also will hold them to be void



BumRushDaShow

(153,696 posts)
2. Thank you for a copy of the order!
Thu May 29, 2025, 02:00 PM
Thursday

Stumbled on this 2nd ruling when looking for articles with more info on the pending SCOTUS appeal.

LetMyPeopleVote

(164,108 posts)
3. I have not finished reading the International Trade Court opinion
Thu May 29, 2025, 02:07 PM
Thursday

There are too may fun opinions coming down to keep up and still get some billable hours in

Captain Zero

(7,903 posts)
4. TACO for the Reversal!
Thu May 29, 2025, 02:17 PM
Thursday

Load up those TACOs with salsa and sour cream for the big old TACO whine baby!

chowder66

(10,608 posts)
5. Also from the article
Thu May 29, 2025, 02:30 PM
Thursday

"According to the administration, the court order would strip the president of leverage in trade negotiations, imperil the trade deals already reached, and make the country vulnerable to countries that “feel a renewed boldness to take advantage of” the current situation."

And who's fault it that, TACO TRUMP?!

""His claimed emergency is a figment of his own imagination," the lawsuit said. "Trade deficits, which have persisted for decades without causing economic harm, are not an emergency."

LetMyPeopleVote

(164,108 posts)
8. In order to get a stay of the ruling on tariffs, trump's attorneys had to promise to refund all tariffs
Fri May 30, 2025, 10:32 AM
Friday

trump's attorneys had to make the legal commitment to refund all tariffs in order to get a stay of the rulings on trump's tariffs. The court of appeals issued the stay of the two injunctions based on the agreement by the trump administration to refund all tariffs if the ruling of these two courts are upheld on appeal. 






BREAKING - Trump admin pledges to refund tariffs: Donald Trump’s Justice Department persuaded the U.S. Court of Appeals to stay the lower court’s injunction on his emergency tariffs—after pledging to refund anyone who paid them if it ultimately loses. In its filings, the government stated, “If tariffs imposed on plaintiffs during these appeals are ultimately held unlawful, then the government will issue refunds to plaintiffs, including any post-judgment interest that accrues.” The court granted the stay.


LetMyPeopleVote

(164,108 posts)
10. Both cases are currently before the DC Circuit
Fri May 30, 2025, 10:47 AM
Friday

It is my understanding that this stay applies to both cases

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Second court blocks Trump...