DHS removes list of 'sanctuary' cities after sheriffs push back on non-compliant label

[BumRushDaShow]

Source: Reuters

June 1, 2025 2:53 PM EDT Updated an hour ago


WASHINGTON, June 1 (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security removed a list of "sanctuary" states, cities and counties from its website following sharp criticism from a sheriffs' association that said a list of "non-compliant" sheriffs could severely damage the relationship between the Trump administration and law enforcement. DHS on Thursday published a list of what it called "sanctuary" jurisdictions that allegedly limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

The list prompted a response from the National Sheriffs' Association, which represents more than 3,000 elected sheriffs across the U.S. and generally supports federal immigration enforcement. Sheriff Kieran Donahue, president of the association, said in a statement on Saturday that DHS published "a list of alleged noncompliant sheriffs in a manner that lacks transparency and accountability." Donahue said the list was created without input from sheriffs and "violated the core principles of trust, cooperation, and partnership with fellow law enforcement."

President Donald Trump had called for his administration to tally alleged sanctuary jurisdictions in a late April executive order, saying the lack of cooperation amounted to "a lawless insurrection." The DHS website listing the jurisdictions was offline on Sunday, an issue that Fox News host Maria Bartiromo raised with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on "Sunday Morning Futures." "I saw that there was a list produced," Bartiromo said. "Now, the list I don't see anymore in the media. Do you have a list of the sanctuary cities that are actually hiding illegals right now?" Noem did not acknowledge the list being taken offline but said some localities had bristled.

"Some of the cities have pushed back," Noem said. "They think because they don't have one law or another on the books that they don't qualify, but they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals." Leaders of some cities publicly questioned the sanctuary label this week, including jurisdictions in Southern California, Colorado and Massachusetts. San Diego City Attorney Heather Ferbert told local outlets that San Diego - named on the DHS list - had never adopted a sanctuary policy and that the move appeared to be politically motivated. “We suspect this is going to be used as additional threats and fear tactics to threaten federal funding that the city relies on," she said.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/dhs-removes-list-sanctuary-cities-after-sheriffs-push-back-non-compliant-label-2025-06-01/

[J_William_Ryan]

1. There's no such thing as 'sanctuary' cities.

The Constitution has long acknowledged that states and local jurisdictions cannot be compelled to enforce Federal laws – including Federal immigration law.

There is likewise no such thing as a ‘noncompliant’ jurisdiction because, again, states and cities are not required to ‘comply’ with Federal requests to assist with enforcing Federal immigration law.

The administration’s policy is in fact politically motivated, the withholding of funds from cities that exercise their right to not comply with Federal law enforcement is illegal and un-Constitutional.

[electricmonk]

2. Just once

I want to hear someone from this administration admit to making a mistake. Instead every time they either double down, pass the blame or deflect. Kristi is just about the worst at it too. They had Tazewell, Virginia on the list. A place deep in the heart of coal country that voted 85% for Trump and is around 90% white.

[BumRushDaShow]

3. What's worse is their apparent AI search FAIL

from here - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143469084

Several communities said they have been outspoken supporters of the president and his stringent immigration policies and do not understand why they have been included. Among them: Shawano County, Wisconsin; Alexandria, Virginia; and Huntington Beach, California.

Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, thinks the administration may have confused the county’s vote in 2021 to become a “Second Amendment Sanctuary County” that prohibits gun control measures with it being a safe haven for immigrants. He said the county has approved no immigration sanctuary policies.

They "searched" on the term "sanctuary" and grabbed any locale that used the term.... including the RW loon "2nd Amendment Sanctuary" municipalities/counties, and threw them on the list. Because. "Sanctuary".

[electricmonk]

4. yep,

just utter incompetence all around.