Wins by the far-left set up challenge for Hakeem Jeffries
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: The Hill
The growing wave of primary victories by democratic socialists is poised to pose a major challenge for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) if Democrats retake the House in the midterms.
...
The arrival of the far-left Democrats, and the anti-establishment energy they represent, could leave Jeffries confronting some of the same issues that have plagued House GOP leaders: managing a broad ideological coalition with little room for defection.
...
Asked whether she would support Jeffries for Speaker, Kiros told HillTV she would not be “supporting anybody for leadership that takes corporate PAC money.”
...
Progressive Democrats have increasingly described Israel’s military campaign in Gaza as a genocide and have called for conditioning or halting U.S. military aid to Israel, while some moderate Democrats have continued to back Israel’s right to defend itself.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5952236-democratic-socialists-challenge-jeffries/
Beyond the semantics of "socialist" and "progressive" and "moderate", the article suggests that the main ideological differences within the Party seem to be taking corporate PAC money (and, by extension, delivering legislation and regulations favorable to corporations) and whether Israel is committing "genocide" or exercising its "right to defend itself."
Polls just released by the Brennan Center for Justice show huge bipartisan support for severely limiting corporate influence on elections. Pew Research showed similarly bipartisan opposition to Israel's actions (including 80% of Dems).
The "challenge" for Jeffries is whether or not he will continue to push the Party to accept massive contributions from corporations and pro-Israel lobbyists, or get in line with hugely popular positions. It seems to me that taking the moral high ground allows the Dems to go on the attack against corruption and lay out a vision centered squarely around affordability, rather than scrambling to define the incremental differences.
I have little interest in primarying Jeffries, but he does need to feel pressure to get in step with where people in the Party are at right now. Focusing on the semantics between "socialist" and "moderate" only obscures the heart of the matter, to the detriment of our Party.
= new reply since forum marked as read
"Dems in disarray" 
And I think taking big corporate, "donations," make us no better that rethuglicans taking bribes. So, I guess I'm in the far Left column, but that certainly doesn't mean I won't support a Dem every time.
