Speaker Johnson says House will pass Trump's voter ID bill through arduous process after GOP revolt
Source: CNN Politics
PUBLISHED Jul 5, 2026, 1:53 PM ET
House Speaker Mike Johnson said he plans to move quickly to advance President Donald Trumps signature voter ID legislation through the arduous budget reconciliation process once the House returns to Washington, downplaying the heightened tensions within the GOP after he sent lawmakers home early for the holidays after a few Republicans brought the floor to a halt.
I just decided it was best to send everybody home to go celebrate July Fourth in their districts. Well come back, gather everybody together, he told Fox News on Sunday. The big urgency is to get SAVE America passed. The president has that as a top priority, and so do I.
Last week, a small group of conservative hardliners, led by Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, effectively blocked a key procedural vote to advance several bills on the floor out of protest that Congress had not sent the SAVE America Act to the presidents desk.
Driven by frustration, Trump has already held up a critical intelligence nomination and declined to sign a major bipartisan housing package, despite Senate GOP leaders insisting that they do not have the 60 votes needed to overcome the filibuster and proceed with the elections overhaul bill.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/05/politics/johnson-house-voter-id-bill
littlemissmartypants
(35,708 posts)rampartd
(5,685 posts)start now.
state id
birth certificate
social security card
marriage documents
divorce documents
adoption documents
passport
sinkingfeeling
(58,309 posts)rampartd
(5,685 posts)this has been on the wish list for a long time. eventually it will pass.
ananda
(35,901 posts)...
regnaD kciN
(27,762 posts)
so it will only need 50 plus CouchBoy.
The only question is if the Senate parliamentarian rules it isnt valid in a reconciliation bill and, if so, if the Republican majority opts to disregard that ruling for the first time ever.
ananda
(35,901 posts)???
groundloop
(14,022 posts)And with our current right wing activist Supreme Court there's always the chance they'll get away with this nonsense.
Nictuku
(4,693 posts)Lets not forget that TSF wanted to have Sen. Thune fire the Parliamentarian, who will be the one to shoot this down if it has provisions that are not budgetary.
Javaman
(66,046 posts)BumRushDaShow
(174,025 posts)The parliamentarian ruled that the SAVE America Act did not comply with the Senates Byrd Rule, which determines what legislation is eligible to be included in a budget reconciliation package that can pass with a simple-majority vote, thereby avoiding a filibuster and 60-vote threshold.
As a result, Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) two Trump allies had to ask for 60 votes to waive the budgetary objections in order to consider their proposals to amend the budget reconciliation package with the SAVE America Act.
Both motions fell well short of sixty votes.
(snip)
That's why it was briefly floated to stick it on the annual NDAA and Thune all but guaranteed that it would be stripped from that.
Doing the same thing over and over is the proverbial "definition of insanity".
hedda_foil
(17,067 posts)There are still another 2-1/2 years left in this term (providing he lives that long and doesn't decide to be declared dictator for life). Can the institutions we know and love possibly hold out that long?
BumRushDaShow
(174,025 posts)Just like Democrats couldn't muster the votes to do that in 2021 so we could codify Roe and pass 2 voting-related bills (and Schumer tried multiple times).
dave99
(766 posts)orleans
(37,548 posts)Bengus81
(10,650 posts)bluestarone
(22,617 posts)Baitball Blogger
(52,947 posts)Wiz Imp
(10,951 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(6,084 posts)Then it is 51 votes.
BumRushDaShow
(174,025 posts)as a non-budget policy rider - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3690308
Wiz Imp
(10,951 posts)That's already been decided.
karynnj
(61,271 posts)However, I think the parliamentarian in the Senate may disallow that as it doesn't meet the rules.
BumRushDaShow
(174,025 posts)karynnj
(61,271 posts)More importantly, the article should have pointed that out instead of implicitly giving Johnson credit for planning an arduous path to passage.
BumRushDaShow
(174,025 posts)and kick the can back to Thune.
Reconciliation is not a House Rule but a Senate Rule, so Johnson is irrelevant and he and the House have to adapt their legislation to pass muster in the Senate or the Senate will do it themselves, and strip stuff out of the House version.
Karasu
(2,414 posts)dave99
(766 posts)sinkingfeeling
(58,309 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(24,620 posts)Republicans in the senate have already declared the bill DOA.
UpInArms
(55,707 posts)Mike Johnson is a hideous excuse for a human
Trumpdumper
(239 posts)No chance of Senate concurrence. And even if THAT happened, it would not pass constitutional muster. Roberts and Barrett would side with the liberals.
Baitball Blogger
(52,947 posts)Sneederbunk
(17,824 posts)Xipe Totec
(44,607 posts)Let alone 218 Republican House members infighting and in disarray.
C Moon
(13,840 posts)Martin68
(28,382 posts)dave99
(766 posts)area51
(12,804 posts)And what? Make them an offer they can't refuse?
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(139,127 posts)Ford_Prefect
(8,700 posts)BaronChocula
(5,029 posts)He can say he's going to do something that's impossible to appease a group of morons, but it doesn't reopen the doors that have already closed on this monstrosity.