Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(174,087 posts)
Tue Jul 7, 2026, 03:45 AM 12 hrs ago

Supreme Court lets Texas restrict minors' access to app stores for the time being

Source: NPR

July 6, 2026 4:15 PM ET


The Supreme Court on Monday allowed a Texas law prohibiting minors from downloading apps without their parent's consent to go into effect.

Multiple organizations had sued the state, arguing that the law violates children's freedom of speech. But in an unsigned, unexplained order, the high court allowed Texas to enforce the law as lawsuits continue in lower courts.

Texas enacted its App Store Accountability Act in 2025. The law requires app stores to verify all users' ages, and it prevents children under age 18 from downloading most apps without parental consent. Texas told a lower court that legislators enacted the law in order to keep minors from seeing "harmful" material.

Challengers argued that such a broad law is plainly unconstitutional under a variety of Supreme Court precedents, holding that children do have substantial free speech rights.

Read more: https://www.npr.org/2026/07/06/nx-s1-5883978/supreme-court-texas-app-store-minors



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/070626zr1_dc8f.pdf
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court lets Texas restrict minors' access to app stores for the time being (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago OP
Ahh, yes. That specific word that explains the specific issues that the law is addressing. OldBaldy1701E 7 hrs ago #1
Texas' argument to the court was smart jgmiller 6 hrs ago #2

OldBaldy1701E

(11,889 posts)
1. Ahh, yes. That specific word that explains the specific issues that the law is addressing.
Tue Jul 7, 2026, 08:06 AM
7 hrs ago

'Harmful'.

A word whose definition shifts like the sands of time whenever some self-righteous know nothing decides that they should force others to believe the same stupid shit that they do, and have decided that anything that they don't like has to be 'harmful'.

You know... things like reading books other than the Bible, allowing women and minorities to be treated like normal human beings, worshiping anything other than the almighty dollar (which they hide by connecting their greed to their church), things like that.

Basically, 'harmful' translates into 'things that we don't like'.

jgmiller

(717 posts)
2. Texas' argument to the court was smart
Tue Jul 7, 2026, 09:32 AM
6 hrs ago

The suit claimed this was a 1st ammendment issue but Texas countered saying it applied to all apps and it was a law regulating commerce. States do have the right to put limits on commercial enterprises, where this might have an issue is that since the app store croses statelines it might violate the commerce clause.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court lets Texas ...