Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Passages

(2,742 posts)
Mon May 5, 2025, 02:23 PM Monday

Demonizers

David Horowitz bequeathed his rage-filled and slanderous extremism to Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, and MAGA world.

by Harold Meyerson May 5, 2025

David Horowitz died last Tuesday, but his spirit, I grieve to report, lives on. Indeed, it has state power.

Any number of public figures have careers that follow a left-to-right, or right-to-left, trajectory. Even among his fellow left-to-rightsters, though, Horowitz stood out. His journey from extreme left to extreme right was so, well, extreme that the through line of his affinity for extremism ultimately overshadows the claims of mere ideology. He carried with him from his youth the belief that any conflict he participated in (never mind that he provoked almost all of them) was, in the words of “The International,” “the final conflict.” No conflict was worth his time if it didn’t enable him to vilify, slander, and demonize his opponents, who, no matter where they stood on the ideological spectrum, necessarily had to pose a threat to civilization itself, according to the Horowitz gospel. So grave a threat required an almost Goebbels-esque level of vilification and falsification (else, you might not think it all that grave). But Horowitz was not only up to that task; he reveled in it.

Horowitz had a conventional American communist childhood—his parents were party members until they quit after Khrushchev’s revelations of Stalin’s crimes—and in his twenties became a comrade of the great Marxist biographer Isaac Deutscher. While serving as an editor of Ramparts, he became enamored of the less scholastic revolutionaries of the Black Panthers, whom Horowitz hailed as “America’s Viet Cong.” He grew close to party leader Huey Newton. When a woman he’d recruited to be the Panthers’ bookkeeper was found murdered, however, he believed that the Panthers, in an effort to keep her from disclosing criminal irregularities, had been the killers. Beset by guilt and horror, he repudiated the Panthers, and over the next decade, the entire left.

But the attributes that had attracted him to the Panthers—not just their better angels, in their food banks and other community services, but also, more pointedly, their Manichaean worldview and their complementary belief in violence—were his own attributes as well. That’s not to say he ever took up the gun, but he very deliberately and consistently tried to approximate that by other means. As he famously instructed others on the right, they should “begin every confrontation by punching progressives in the mouth.”

SNIP
That power was in full display last Thursday, when Miller, now Trump’s deputy chief of staff, went before the White House press corps for a full half-hour to praise his boss’s first hundred days as a second-term president. Miller had long since won a reputation as the architect of Trump’s cruelest policies, most notably, the separation of border-crossing small children from their parents during Trump’s first term. He enhanced that reputation by his performance on Thursday, where his praise of Trump was eclipsed by his Horowitzian attack on the press. As The Washington Post recounted, Miller “raised his voice and banged the lectern. He accused the media of siding with ‘terrorists’ in its coverage of undocumented immigrants, told them they live in condos in nice areas [far from the terror of gangs] and decried the “‘cancerous, communist, woke culture that is destroying this country.’”
https://prospect.org/politics/2025-05-05-demonizers-david-horowitz-stephen-miller/

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Demonizers