Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(125,053 posts)
Wed Jun 25, 2025, 02:16 PM Wednesday

Senate ruling could save U.S. Forest Service land from being sold

EVERETT — A Senate official ruled against language in a budget bill that would have allowed the sale of U.S. Forest Service land in Snohomish County.

On June 11, U.S. Senator Mike Lee, a Utah Republican and chairman of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, released bill text revealing plans to sell millions of acres of federal land as part of President Donald Trump’s tax and spending bill.

In Snohomish County, U.S. Forest Service land, including areas surrounding Gold Mountain, parts of Helena Ridge, areas of Mount Pilchuck and popular hiking trails by Lake 22 and Heather Lake, would have been up for sale.

On Monday, however, Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled against Lee’s proposal because doesn’t follow a Senate rule that bars non-budget items from being included in reconciliation bills. The ruling does not decide the merit of the proposal but it blocks Republicans from including it in the budget reconciliation bill, which has dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill.”

https://www.heraldnet.com/news/senate-ruling-could-save-u-s-forest-service-land-from-being-sold/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate ruling could save U.S. Forest Service land from being sold (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Wednesday OP
shithole wants to destroy, deface, damage, and make a profit from it...................... Lovie777 Wednesday #1
Overlapping problems create uncertainty over the future of the Republican megabill LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #2

LetMyPeopleVote

(165,324 posts)
2. Overlapping problems create uncertainty over the future of the Republican megabill
Thu Jun 26, 2025, 05:05 PM
Thursday

Donald Trump has said the GOP is united behind the inaptly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The truth for Republicans isn't nearly that simple.

Overlapping problems create uncertainty over the future of the Republican megabill www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo... via @msnbc

Slapshot1955 (@slapshot19551.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T20:41:04.730Z



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/overlapping-problems-create-uncertainty-future-republican-megabill-rcna214977

As things stand, Republicans are basically confronting five problems:

1. GOP numbers aren’t adding up: The Congressional Budget Office concluded last week that the House version of the package would add $3.4 trillion to the national debt, and this week, the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation found that proposed Senate changes would add an additional $400 billion to the price tag.

2. The Byrd bath: Because Republicans are relying on the budget reconciliation process, which prevents Democrats from derailing the bill with a filibuster, GOP lawmakers are having to subject the legislation to a complex process — which includes having the Senate parliamentarian remove provisions that run afoul of certain budgetary rules. This process is known as the “Byrd bath,” named after the late Democratic Sen. Bob Byrd of West Virginia.

In recent days, several key measures have already been stricken from the bill, including elements the party was counting on to help GOP numbers add up. This has caused a behind-the-scenes scramble that has not yet been resolved.

On Thursday, the developments for the party managed to get even worse. NBC News reported, "Republicans suffered a blow Thursday after the Senate referee ruled that a series of health care cuts and savings in their sweeping domestic policy bill are ineligible for the party-line path they're using to get around the chamber's 60-vote threshold."

The result leaves GOP leaders with limited choices: They can (a) look for other solutions; (b) try to tweak the legislation and ask the parliamentarian to take another look; or (c) vote to override the parliamentarian, which would be a radical and dramatic move that would risk altering how the institution functions going forward.

3. Far-right House Republicans think the Senate’s approach isn’t conservative enough: As The New York Times reported, “Some conservatives in the House only grudgingly voted for the legislation the first time, arguing that it did not go far enough in cutting spending, including on Medicaid. They agreed to support the package only after securing what they characterized as commitments from their Senate colleagues to enact deeper cuts and fix the measure. Now, those House Republicans regard the bill taking shape in the Senate, which party leaders hope to push through within days, as even worse.”

4. House Republicans from competitive districts think the Senate’s approach is too conservative: As NBC News reported, “On Tuesday, 16 House Republicans — almost all representing competitive districts — sent a letter rebelling against the Senate’s Medicaid cuts. They fretted that those policies would ‘place additional burdens on hospitals,’ among other things.”

5. The entire effort is unpopular. I mean, really unpopular. Republican officials have been working on this for roughly eight months, and talking up how great their plan is, but at least for now, the American mainstream isn't buying what the GOP is selling, which puts added pressure on members worried about their re-election prospects.

Given the scope of the intraparty disagreements, it’s not yet clear how, when or whether Republicans will work out their differences, and given the narrow margins in both chambers, the margin of error for party leaders is small. That said, if recent history is any guide, most, if not all, of the GOP members expressing skepticism about the legislation can be expected to cave after a couple of angry phone calls and tweets from the president.

We are headed to a debt ceiling issue soon which is why trump wants this bill done by July 4. I doubt that this will happen and we may see an emergency extension of the debt ceiling.
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»Senate ruling could save ...