Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(125,937 posts)
Tue May 6, 2025, 02:14 PM Tuesday

Opinion Pierre Poilievre thinks he's retreating to Conservative safety in Alberta. He's really stepping into a

Opinion | Pierre Poilievre thinks he’s retreating to Conservative safety in Alberta. He’s really stepping into a minefield
Updated 33 mins ago
May 6, 2025

Jeff McIntosh The Canadian Press
Gillian-Steward

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/pierre-poilievre-thinks-hes-retreating-to-conservative-safety-in-alberta-hes-really-stepping-into-a/article_3f1b0ce1-1e0a-41e1-aa59-d19d099c153d.html


Pierre Poilievre has retreated to a safe Alberta seat after losing his Ottawa one to the Liberals. Of course, he will win by a comfortable majority. But in the meantime he’ll have to figure out what to do about the ticking time bomb he’s been handed by the Alberta premier.

The day after the election and before Conservative party leader Poilievre had decided where to run, Danielle Smith introduced amendments to legislation that would make it easier for groups to trigger referenda. The number of signatures required on a petition would be about 177,000 compared to the 600,000 needed now. That would make it so much easier to have a referendum on separation from the rest of Canada. Or maybe becoming the 51st U.S. state.

Smith seems to want to facilitate a referendum on separation while playing coy about whether she supports Alberta separating from the rest of Canada or not. And of course holding a referendum on the subject will distract Albertans from pressing issues, such as the sinking price of oil, which affects government coffers and the government’s role in a health care scandal that seems to get worse by the week.

.........

It will be interesting to see how Pierre Poilievre handles that. He couldn’t possibly support separation from the rest of Canada now being promoted by a small band of fanatics. Doing so would destroy what turned out to be a healthy level of support for Conservatives in the rest of Canada. That’s not what they signed up for. Even most Conservatives in Alberta and Saskatchewan.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinion Pierre Poilievre thinks he's retreating to Conservative safety in Alberta. He's really stepping into a (Original Post) applegrove Tuesday OP
Yep this is the agenda IbogaProject Tuesday #1
They make a very good point... Spazito Tuesday #2
A separation referendum would be nonbinding and unenforceable Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #3
I received a call from the Alberta Republican Party... Spazito Saturday #4

IbogaProject

(4,379 posts)
1. Yep this is the agenda
Tue May 6, 2025, 02:48 PM
Tuesday

The GOP want a new red state to push us further into the minority in the Senate.

Spazito

(55,182 posts)
2. They make a very good point...
Tue May 6, 2025, 03:02 PM
Tuesday

It will be a minefield for him with the fanatics' push for separation and the hypocritical stance of Smith on that very issue.

Fiendish Thingy

(19,261 posts)
3. A separation referendum would be nonbinding and unenforceable
Tue May 6, 2025, 03:21 PM
Tuesday

It’s just Smiths lunatic way of keeping the rubes riled up.

Polling last month showed only 30% of Albertans supported separation.

Spazito

(55,182 posts)
4. I received a call from the Alberta Republican Party...
Sat May 10, 2025, 08:18 AM
Saturday

doing a poll about separation. It looks like the UCP support is already splintering into two factions which will be good for the NDP next provincial election.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Canada»Opinion Pierre Poilievre...