Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(153,902 posts)
4. We won't really see that much of an effect economically
Fri May 2, 2025, 08:44 AM
May 2

until at least after June (there was a whole set of feds expected to be laid off June 1st).

The Fed is still looking at "inflation" and the effects of the tariffs are going to impact that. But they haven't been in effect long enough due to being put off and put off until now, and even with that, having some "big ticket item" (cars) exceptions.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Will this make it less likely the Fed lowers interest? OrlandoDem2 May 2 #1
We won't really see that much of an effect economically BumRushDaShow May 2 #4
Yes, the expected # of rate cuts this year has declined mathematic May 2 #20
Anyone but me question the validity of any numbers coming out of the ShitStains administration? NoMoreRepugs May 2 #2
I was going to ask the same question gab13by13 May 2 #3
I posted this in another thread but it's relevant here too. yardwork May 2 #6
I'd say they are real,temps warming up seasonal hiring is going again. Bengus81 May 2 #18
The reported numbers (177,000 payroll jobs, 4.2% unemployment rate) are seasonally adjusted progree May 2 #21
That was my immediate thought. yardwork May 2 #5
Why not? Republicans always said Biden manipulated the data. Self Esteem May 2 #7
Yes there is dirtrust in govt. accounting now more than ever which is part of the repuke plan BUT Cheezoholic May 2 #12
Distrust in this government is warranted and necessary. gab13by13 May 2 #16
I think that's what I said, giving reasons why. Sorry if i wasn't clear ;) n/t Cheezoholic May 2 #17
BLS is still independent Johnny2X2X May 2 #11
Correct. Having worked on the Current Employment Statistics program for close to 35 years, Wiz Imp May 2 #14
Trump willblame them on Biden when they turn bad Johnny2X2X May 2 #15
Many federal workers no longer reporting to work are on mahatmakanejeeves May 2 #25
There are several problems with that. First, staff on admin leave still get paid so they haven't actually been fired. Wiz Imp May 2 #29
Fork in the Road, Part 2 mahatmakanejeeves May 2 #30
In my Rebl2 May 2 #19
first thing that popped into my head rurallib May 2 #28
i dont trust any data coming from this admin Fullduplexxx May 2 #31
Sincerely angrychair May 2 #8
See post #7 MichMan May 2 #9
LINKS to some BLS Data Series Numbers and Graphs. Also, downward revisions of prior 2 months make it a gain of 119k progree May 2 #10
Those are good numbers considering FredGarvin May 2 #13
The Headline Number Is Better Than Expected, However DallasNE May 2 #22
Thanks. I'll have to add that to the calendar. NT mahatmakanejeeves May 2 #26
Wouldn't that be the BIDEN payroll growth? Grins May 2 #23
Enjoy it while you can. louis-t May 2 #24
Long-term unemployed 27 weeks or longer as a percent of total unemployed progree May 2 #27
'The Golden Age is here': US Labor Secy. reacts to April jobs data, 5/2/25 progree May 3 #32
That would have been a "disastrous" number during the Biden administration Orrex May 3 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. payroll growth total...»Reply #4