Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(41,183 posts)
23. You're right. The base drive of this majority is Mammon. Selling out. Being "on the take."
Fri May 2, 2025, 07:13 PM
May 2

Selling their souls to Mammon's money worshipping oligarchs of, by and for Mammon's mob boss of the Executive Branch. There's good capitalism, bad capitalism, and then there's Mammon capitalism.

We use different words but we generally agree on the big picture, which is the climate of fear and evil these suited fiends create in their economic/currency/market hell. By 2028 we'll be fighting to prevent a land whose entrance says,

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Frivolous Lawsuits? Chasstev365 May 2025 #1
The GOP uses the law to protect themselves and gain power and money. Irish_Dem May 2025 #2
Francis Wilhoit: markodochartaigh May 2025 #11
Indeed. OldBaldy1701E May 2 #16
"And, what is giving these conservatives the power to do that?" The felon's majority. ancianita May 2 #20
I was going for a more 'base' answer, but you are correct. OldBaldy1701E May 2 #21
You're right. The base drive of this majority is Mammon. Selling out. Being "on the take." ancianita May 2 #23
Trump is just the sleazy salesman, the GOP is all in for a fascist dictatorship. Irish_Dem May 2025 #3
A lawsuit a plaintiff has won is by definition not a frivolous lawsuit. SunSeeker May 2 #14
They are contributing to making trump NJCher May 2025 #4
rather short-sighted keroro gunsou May 2 #15
The Judicial Branch is the third leg of our democracy. . . . h2ebits May 2025 #5
Absolutely...this is overreach by the legislative branch. It won't stand PortTack May 2 #17
Thanks for your support. I'm not an attorney but the bloviating has long since gotten ridiculous. h2ebits May 2 #19
Does this bill likely have the votes in the house to pass? SSJVegeta May 2025 #6
There is one of them words i hate. (FRIVOLOUS) bluestarone May 2025 #7
All according the "Tyrant's Handbook" Grins May 2025 #8
Here it comes Iamscrewed May 2025 #9
The triad of checks and balances BidenRocks May 2025 #10
... Solly Mack May 2025 #12
That bill is about as unconstitutional as it gets. It would immediately be challenged. SunSeeker May 2 #13
Thank you for the informed post! It's really important that we understand what they are up to, but also the PortTack May 2 #18
What worries me is who the courts can get to physically enforce their rulings muriel_volestrangler May 2 #22
Me too, so I researched it, and courts can deputize local law enforcement. SunSeeker May 2 #24
Interesting - thanks for that muriel_volestrangler May 3 #25
It's not just Trump. J_William_Ryan May 3 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Power of judges to hold T...»Reply #23