Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tarzanrock

(1,100 posts)
3. This is a bullshit specious legal argument which is totally devoid of merit, to wit:
Mon May 12, 2025, 07:03 PM
May 12

"... claiming that such “Agency Reductions in Force and Reorganization Plans” (ARRPs) contain privileged information that could, among other things, cause “embarrassment” or “annoyance” for the government."
1.) There is no such "privilege;" 2.) "embarrassment" is no privilege; 3.) "annoyance" for the government is not privileged.
The Turd only employs the world's shittiest lawyers who make only the most meritless of specious arguments. This Judge should "sanction" every lawyer who "signed" these pleadings and made an appearance in the courtroom on this matter the maximum monetary amount for sanctions allowable under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Procedurally erroneous':...»Reply #3