Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(64,874 posts)
8. Gorsuch has long been a strong advocate for indigenous rights.
Tue May 27, 2025, 03:43 PM
May 27

Why that is so puzzles many people.

Mark Joseph Stern
‪@mjsdc.bsky.social‬

Follow
The Supreme Court refuses to consider whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act bars the government from destroying a sacred Western Apache site by turning it into a copper mine. Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, has an incandescently angry dissent. www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE
ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this
petition.
JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS joins,
dissenting from the denial of certiorari.
For centuries, Western Apaches have worshipped at
Chí’chil Biłdagoteel, or Oak Flat. They consider the site a
sacred and “direct corridor to the Creator.” Pet. for Cert. 8.
It is a place where tribal members conduct “religious ceremonies that cannot take place elsewhere.” Ibid. Recognizing Oak Flat’s significance, the government has long protected both the land and the Apaches’ access to it.
No more. Now, the government and a mining conglomerate want to turn Oak Flat into a massive hole in the ground.
To extract copper lying beneath the land, they plan to blast
tunnels that will result in a crater perhaps 1,000 feet deep
and nearly two miles wide. 101 F. 4th 1036, 1131 (CA9
2024) (en banc) (Murguia, C. J., dissenting). “It is undisputed” that the government’s plan will permanently “destroy the Apaches’ historical place of worship, preventing
them from ever again engaging in religious exercise” at Oak
Flat. Id., at 1129.
ALT
May 27, 2025 at 9:35 AM

The Supreme Court refuses to consider whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act bars the government from destroying a sacred Western Apache site by turning it into a copper mine. Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, has an incandescently angry dissent. www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...

Mark Joseph Stern (@mjsdc.bsky.social) 2025-05-27T13:35:40.743Z

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

For christ's sake, how many times are white men going to screw over our indigenous people? Midnight Writer May 27 #1
Theft of Indigenous lands Bayard May 27 #6
And in this case, all of the Court's women Polybius May 27 #14
6-2 to deny. "ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition." mahatmakanejeeves May 28 #15
SCOTUS seems passive-aggressive & contrarian bucolic_frolic May 27 #2
Well, the two dissents only underscore the "broken clock" theory... hlthe2b May 27 #3
And here is direct evidence of how "religious freedom" slightlv May 27 #4
I will be interested to see how the Apaches respond. TomSlick May 27 #5
Makes me wonder what Gorsuch's and Thomas' true motivations are. Torchlight May 27 #7
Gorsuch has long been a strong advocate for indigenous rights. mahatmakanejeeves May 27 #8
Between his Dobbs' decision Torchlight May 27 #9
it's an op, like maggats always do DoBW May 27 #12
I donʻt understand this. Iʻm under a fair amount of stress and time stress too atm but this makes no sense to me. mahina May 27 #10
Gorsuch has a strong history in siding with Native American issues before the court, so his vote I get Polybius May 27 #13
Agree! Where the hell are we? bluestarone May 28 #16
FAFO...wannabe John Galts spawn George Haydukes. pecosbob May 27 #11
The big issue is the land is not reservation land but Federal Land.. EX500rider May 28 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gorsuch, Thomas dissent a...»Reply #8