Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 93 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Not for unelected judges...»Reply #3
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

In reply to the discussion: 'Not for unelected judges to decide': Trump admin says tariffs are 'immune from judicial scrutiny' as it appeals order [View all]

Progressive dog

(7,495 posts)
3. The stupidity of Trump never fails
Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Thu May 29, 2025, 12:56 PM
May 29

to surprise. The courts are not deciding, the decision was made long ago. The courts just bothered to read the Constitution and the law.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

10 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

watertigerKeepthesoulaliveMarthe48FakeNooseDem2theMaxMysterianIbogaProjectjoshdawgwyn borkinsLudwigPastorius
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Not for unelected judges to decide': Trump admin says tariffs are 'immune from judicial scrutiny' as it appeals order [View all] BumRushDaShow May 29 OP
7-2 Fail in the Supreme Court Chasstev365 May 29 #1
seeking immunity at SCOTUS again. They created an addiction for power. /tn bucolic_frolic May 29 #2
The stupidity of Trump never fails Progressive dog May 29 #3
He's having a really miserable month. Torchlight May 29 #4
"delicate diplomatic efforts" ?? yonder May 29 #5
Checks and balances, Mr President k_buddy762 May 29 #6
But A-okay for non-elected DOGE to decide the fate of thousands and US policies? sinkingfeeling May 29 #7
El Stupido and his band of traitors should understand - Nigrum Cattus May 29 #8
All those high-priced lawyers working for Chump FakeNoose May 29 #9
"A stay is critical to avoid immediate irreparable harm to United States foreign policy and national security." Grins May 29 #10
Filed with the court - yesterday. Same DAY as the decision. Grins May 29 #11
That's only if Congress enacts them. Not the President. cstanleytech May 29 #12
Exactly when was SCROTUS elected? dickthegrouch May 29 #13
Do They Mean "Unelected Judges" Like the Supremes Who Lied in Their Hearings, Have Foresworn Precedent, The Roux Comes First May 29 #14
trump's attorneys had to make the legal commitment to refund all tariffs in order to get a stay of the rulings on trump' LetMyPeopleVote May 30 #15
We shall see if the roberts court believes in the rules of law. republianmushroom May 30 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Not for unelected judges...»Reply #3
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2025 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.