Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

orleans

(36,069 posts)

19. LOL! well said!

Reply to Figarosmom (Reply #17)

Thu May 29, 2025, 09:33 PM

May 29

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dchill

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bondi Eliminates ABA's Role in Vetting Trump Judicial Picks [View all] LetMyPeopleVote May 29 OP

Sorry asshole, but your god emperor king man baby is, as you say, NOT ABOVE THE LAW! Initech May 29 #1

Yep. However, he effectively is when the law isn't enforced, as has been the problem for the last 5 months... Karasu May 29 #4

i really do hate these people YoshidaYui May 29 #14

It's insane that in one breath they say "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!"... Initech May 29 #15

Somebody's been huffin' SOMETHIN'!!!! BurnDoubt Friday #27

Administration comprised entirely of blatantly unqualified people continues to normalize appointing unqualified people. Karasu May 29 #2

Well she can't prevent the ABA from publishing their opinions on every judicial pick FakeNoose May 29 #3

This move will stop these nominees from cooperating with the ABA LetMyPeopleVote May 29 #6

Just assume ALL are unqualified. Buddyzbuddy May 29 #5

Another lawsuit.... Lovie777 May 29 #7

Based on what. onenote May 29 #8

That's what happens when fascism takes over. SergeStorms May 29 #9

Unfortunately, the ABA no longer functions as a fair arbiter of nominees' qualifications, patphil May 29 #10

The ABA rated 10% of Trump's picks "Not Qualified" vs. 2% for Clinton, clear liberal gatekeeping! LetMyPeopleVote May 29 #11

I am amused that Bondi announced this change at the same time a true asshole is being nominated by trump LetMyPeopleVote May 29 #12

When? liberalgunwilltravel May 29 #13

She wants to make sure that will never happen DFW May 29 #21

The fuhrer wants his henchmen in those judgeships Mysterian May 29 #16

Gee, its like they KNOW their candidates Figarosmom May 29 #17

LOL! well said! orleans May 29 #19

That IS, ironically enough, DFW May 29 #22

Well, that's that. No more merit-based judicial appointments. Martin68 May 29 #18

Trump wants to appoint Otto as Justice Minister DFW May 29 #20

They don't need to be vetted by the Bar Assoc. LudwigPastorius May 29 #23

ONLY TRUMP WHORES NEED APPLY Skittles Friday #24

Now, Skittles - you don't really want to negatively associate... dchill Friday #26

to be honest Skittles Friday #29

Gee, Pam - do you want everybody to think you're a shitty person? dchill Friday #25

Kiss the Ring three times and you're in. BurnDoubt Friday #28

The ABA should go ahead and still publish their ratings on judicial nominees. no_hypocrisy Friday #30

The fascists ripping up the norms calling everyone and everything a left wing plot Mr. Sparkle Friday #31

"I AM THE LAW!" yells judge bondi nt Javaman Friday #32

No problem Blondi Aviation Pro Friday #33