Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetroitLegalBeagle

(2,363 posts)
3. yes and no
Fri Feb 14, 2025, 07:57 AM
Feb 2025

Flying military aircraft is basically always more expensive then a civilian aircraft. They aren't the most fuel efficient and require far more maintenance.

But many of those aircraft used in the flights were going to be flying anyway. Military pilots, like all pilots, are required to have a minimum number of flight hours per year to maintain their qualification on whatever airframes they fly. Whether those flight hours come from flying random training routes over the US, doing a flyover at a sports game or event, or flying migrants back, is irrelevant. Unless they are training for a specific operation type or skill(like mid air refueling or assault landings and takeoffs), flight hours are flight hours regardless of where they are flying. So, in theory, some of these flights could have actually saved money since they were basically training flights for the crew.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Trump Admin's Use Of Mili...»Reply #3