Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(36,773 posts)
1. And the first thing that comes to mind are technicalities.
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 02:15 PM
Nov 2012

How do you manage certification and credentialing?

How do you curb cheating and ghosting, having people do the work for you?

Will it create a raft of pointless low-worth degress in English and sociology and other non-lab courses? I.e., will it lead to a kind of Gresham's law applied to credentialing paper?


It's already been suggesting that flipping the classroom will lead to a revising of how to teach high school. They won't need many teachers. Have one teacher record the lectures or direct instruction and a corps of lesser-trained assistants to actually assist students. Perhaps have one master teacher per district, or outsource the master-teacher work to a consultant that will implement state-mandated content in a single lecture for a topic for the state.


Hard enough to keep kids from "playing school" in order to avoid learning--do the work in a pro forma fashion, getting good grades by making sure that all the blanks are filled in on paper but not worrying about the blanks being filled in in their brains.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»College of Future Could B...»Reply #1