Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
2. Britain, Netherlands, Vancouver and other places have some success with this approach...
Wed Sep 5, 2018, 11:33 AM
Sep 2018

although the same arguments against it still pop up. The arguments are largely moral-- don't subsidize a bad habit.

The arguments for it are largely pragmatic-- it works. It reduces deaths and injury from bad smack and dirty needles. It reduces crime by allowing addicts to work for a living without the daily scramble for a fix. Well, it just works and has far fewer downsides than blowing money away trying to stop addiction by law or methadone.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Drug Policy»Cities defiant after Just...»Reply #2