Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

10. the problem with warrens theory is the strong majority in u.s. are christian. for his pet porn,

Reply to BainsBane (Reply #9)

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 10:37 AM

Dec 2013

the only discussion he seems to have interest in, degrading women in one way or another, if anything brought forward has anything to do with christian faith, he makes it unusable. i left that on the side of the road long ago. we have articles on all kinds of subjects from people who are christian. he does not dig into their history to see if they have proclaimed a christian faith, ergo making that info invalid. obama is christian. ALL he says should be dismissed, per warrens theory.

it is an absolute ridiculous position to hold and have the expectation that all of us will blindly and willingly follow his mandate that no christian have a voice.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How a DU meme begins, and how shameful it really is [View all] boston bean Dec 2013 OP

is that what it was all about? i went into the thread to see why it was kicked. but... seabeyond Dec 2013 #1

I haven't looked at any recent porn threads BainsBane Dec 2013 #6

i think that is so incredibly dishonest i never would have thought they would stoop so low. seabeyond Dec 2013 #7

I'm not surprised BainsBane Dec 2013 #9

the problem with warrens theory is the strong majority in u.s. are christian. for his pet porn, seabeyond Dec 2013 #10

There is mercuryblues Dec 2013 #22

i am tired of the dishonesty. continually saying over and over we are something we are not, until seabeyond Dec 2013 #23

I look at it this way mercuryblues Dec 2013 #25

you are correct. the problem is it feeds an illusion not true. i really abhor dishonesty. seabeyond Dec 2013 #28

I'd say that is a perfect contrast. xulamaude Dec 2013 #27

i keep going back and forth to look if there is some other link. i cannot believe they would be seabeyond Dec 2013 #2

Well I'm shocked. Shocked I tell ya. Not! Little Star Dec 2013 #3

There is nothing liberal or progressive about relegating women to second class citizenship BainsBane Dec 2013 #4

A discussion about the harms of porn for many women turns into boston bean Dec 2013 #5

Oh, and what a surprise to see who kicked it back up. UtahLib Dec 2013 #8

OK here is what's going on: MadrasT Dec 2013 #11

I'd say you hit that nail right on the head. xulamaude Dec 2013 #12

I believe if society did not have such rigid, binary ideas about gender and gender roles, MadrasT Dec 2013 #14

Thanks for your response :) xulamaude Dec 2013 #15

Like my Transgender friend who is also a decorated Vietnam vet ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #16

There is also bi-gendered eridani Dec 2013 #18

I have also heard that described as "gender fluid", and know several folks who identify that way. MadrasT Dec 2013 #19

i read this late last night. i am not devious. not who i am. i do not, cannot think seabeyond Dec 2013 #24

What I find strange ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #13

I don't suppose anyone would point out the obvious contradiction BainsBane Dec 2013 #17

You that "cover your boobs" post ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #20

Of course not. It's about controlling women BainsBane Dec 2013 #21

And their favorite "rule 34" gollygee Dec 2013 #26

new meme of the day. so sad, wrong, disheartening our men on du were attacked. seabeyond Dec 2013 #29